Oreo maker Mondelez International launches a federal lawsuit against Aldi for “blatantly copying” their iconic snack packaging designs, seeking immediate removal of the lookalike products from store shelves.
Key Takeaways
- Mondelez International has sued Aldi in Illinois federal court over packaging that allegedly mimics Oreos, Chips Ahoy, Wheat Thins, and other signature brands
- The lawsuit claims Aldi’s packaging is “likely to deceive and confuse customers” and could “dilute the distinctive quality” of Mondelez’s brand identities
- Mondelez is seeking monetary damages and a court order to stop Aldi from selling the contested products
- Aldi has faced similar packaging lawsuits in the past, including cases in Australia and the UK
Corporate Giant Takes on Discount Competitor
Mondelez International has filed a lawsuit against discount supermarket chain Aldi, accusing the retailer of deliberately copying the packaging designs of its most popular snack brands. The federal lawsuit, filed in Illinois, targets Aldi’s store-brand versions of iconic products including Oreos, Chips Ahoy, Wheat Thins, Nutter Butter, and Nilla Wafers. According to court documents, Mondelez alleges that Aldi’s packaging strategy goes beyond mere resemblance and constitutes a deliberate attempt to mislead consumers into believing they are purchasing the original branded products.
The lawsuit includes side-by-side comparisons showing striking similarities between Aldi’s private label offerings and Mondelez’s established brands. Examples highlighted in the filing include Aldi’s Thin Wheat crackers packaged in gold similar to Wheat Thins, sandwich cookies in blue packaging reminiscent of Oreos, and peanut butter cookies designed to resemble Nutter Butters. Mondelez claims these similarities are not coincidental but rather part of a systematic approach by Aldi to capitalize on the recognition and goodwill of established brands while offering lower-priced alternatives.
Legal Allegations and Brand Protection
“Snack food maker Mondelez International is suing the Aldi supermarket chain, alleging the packaging for Aldi’s store-brand cookies and crackers ‘blatantly copies’ Mondelez products like Chips Ahoy, Wheat Thins, and Oreos,” states Mondelez International, in their lawsuit filing.
The legal action seeks both monetary damages and a court order prohibiting Aldi from selling the products in question. The suit specifically alleges that Aldi’s packaging is “likely to deceive and confuse customers” and could “dilute the distinctive quality of Mondelez’s unique product packaging.” Mondelez claims it has attempted to resolve these issues directly with Aldi on multiple occasions, with the retailer making some changes while continuing other practices that Mondelez considers problematic. Despite repeated outreach, Mondelez alleges that Aldi has persisted in marketing products.
In the lawsuit, snack food maker Mondelez alleges the packaging for Aldi's store-brand cookies and crackers "blatantly copies" its products like Chips Ahoy, Wheat Thins and Oreos.
LINK: https://t.co/uB4BIsEIvr
(📷: AP/Nam Y. Huh) pic.twitter.com/cQXiWjw2V4
— WTHR.com (@WTHRcom) May 30, 2025
Pattern of Imitation Allegations
This lawsuit is not the first time Aldi has faced legal challenges over its packaging practices. The German-owned discount chain has been involved in similar disputes in Australia and the United Kingdom. Aldi’s business model centers on offering products under its own labels at significantly lower prices than national brands, a strategy that has fueled its rapid expansion across the United States. By maintaining a limited inventory of mostly private-label products, Aldi can offer prices that typically undercut traditional supermarkets by 20-40%.
“The lawsuit claims Aldi’s packaging would ‘dilute the distinctive quality of Mondelez’s unique product packaging,'” according to the lawsuit, filed in federal court.
The legal complaint extends beyond simple trademark infringement to include allegations of trade dress infringement, which covers the total visual appearance of a product. Mondelez argues that Aldi has systematically copied the color schemes, imagery, and overall visual identity of multiple product lines, creating a pattern that suggests deliberate imitation rather than coincidental similarity. Aldi has not yet responded to requests for comment regarding the lawsuit, maintaining its typical stance of limited public engagement on legal matters.
Consumer Impact and Market Implications
The lawsuit highlights the ongoing tension between national brand manufacturers and private label retailers. While product imitation is a long-standing practice in retail, the boundary between inspiration and infringement remains contested legal territory. For consumers, the similarity in packaging can create both benefits and drawbacks. Price-conscious shoppers may appreciate the visual cues that help them identify alternatives to more expensive branded products, but others may feel misled if they purchase a store brand believing it to be the national brand product they intended to buy with “similar packaging.”
As the case proceeds through the legal system, it may establish new precedents regarding the acceptable limits of packaging similarity in the competitive grocery marketplace. President Trump’s administration has consistently supported strong intellectual property protections for American businesses, making this case particularly relevant in the current political climate. The outcome could have significant implications for how retailers approach private label packaging and how manufacturers protect their established brand identities in an increasingly competitive marketplace.
