Trump HALTS Government Cash For Abortions

Red stop sign against a clear blue sky.

In a major victory for taxpayers and defenders of the Constitution, the Trump administration is moving to repeal a Biden-era rule that forced Americans to fund abortion travel for unaccompanied migrant minors.

Story Snapshot

  • Trump administration launches formal process to repeal Biden rule funding abortion travel for migrant minors.
  • Move restores compliance with the Hyde Amendment, halting federal taxpayer dollars for abortion-related expenses.
  • Biden’s regulation had required government agencies to facilitate abortion access—even in states with bans.
  • Legal and political battles are expected as advocacy groups line up on both sides of the issue.

Trump Administration Targets Biden’s Abortion Travel Rule

The Trump administration has initiated the formal rollback of a controversial Biden-era regulation that used taxpayer money to pay for unaccompanied migrant minors’ abortion-related travel. The Biden rule, finalized in April 2024, mandated the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) to ensure these minors could access abortions, including out-of-state travel even where states have enacted bans. Trump officials argue that this policy not only undermined state laws but also violated the letter and spirit of the Hyde Amendment, which for nearly fifty years has barred most federal funding for abortion services.

By October 2025, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) had begun a coordinated effort to rescind the Biden regulation. The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) issued a memorandum in July declaring that the Hyde Amendment prohibits federal funding for abortion-related travel, directly contradicting the expansive interpretation adopted by the previous administration. This shift aligns federal policy with the post-Dobbs legal landscape, where the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade eliminated federal constitutional protections for abortion, returning authority to the states.

Heightened Legal and Political Tensions

Conservative legal experts and advocacy groups, including Project 2025, have praised the Trump move as a necessary correction, restoring both fiscal responsibility and respect for state sovereignty. They contend that forcing taxpayers to fund abortion travel for non-citizen minors was an egregious overreach, eroding constitutional limits and undermining the will of states that have enacted abortion bans. On the other side, progressive organizations such as the ACLU and National Women’s Law Center plan to fight the repeal in court, arguing that it endangers vulnerable minors and violates international human rights norms. The Biden rule currently remains in effect, but legal challenges and injunctions are expected as the repeal process moves forward.

Organizations responsible for the care of unaccompanied minors, as well as healthcare providers, now face uncertainty and potential new restrictions. The immediate effect of the Trump administration’s action will likely be to halt the use of federal funds for abortion-related travel, shifting costs to states or private entities. This policy shift also signals a broader rollback of reproductive health initiatives, as seen with the reinstatement of rules curbing such funding for military personnel and foreign aid programs.

Intersection of Immigration, Reproductive Rights, and Federal Authority

This policy battle reflects broader tensions over immigration, reproductive rights, and the reach of federal authority. The Biden administration’s regulation was a response to the 2022 Dobbs decision, seeking to protect abortion access for vulnerable populations, including migrant minors. Trump’s reversal is part of a wider agenda to restore constitutional boundaries, limit government overreach, and prioritize American sovereignty and conservative values. The issue is also likely to generate further litigation, with the possibility of Supreme Court review if lower courts issue conflicting rulings. Short term, affected minors and care providers face legal uncertainty; long term, the outcome will set precedent for how far federal agencies can go in sidestepping state laws and conservative principles.

While some critics argue that there is incomplete data on how ORR funds have been used for abortion travel, the Trump administration’s position is clear: federal agencies must comply strictly with the Hyde Amendment, and taxpayer money cannot be used to subsidize procedures that violate deeply held constitutional and moral values. As the repeal moves forward, the administration is working to ensure that the process is legally robust, anticipating legal challenges from advocacy groups determined to defend the Biden policy.

Sources:

SCOOP: Trump Moves to Scrap Biden Rule Forcing Taxpayers to Fund Alien Children’s Abortion Travel

The Trump Administration’s First Actions in 2025 Targeting Patients, Providers, and Reproductive Health Care Access

What Project 2025 Tells Us the Trump Administration Will Do Next to Limit Access to Reproductive Healthcare

Project 2025 Explained